From Static to Dynamic Job Architecture

Using labour market data and skills signals to keep roles current and compliant.
Wednesday, October 15, 2025
Track
Plenary

Most job architectures are static, slow to change, and disconnected from skills. This session shows how to stand up a dynamic, skills-based architecture that updates as work evolves – powered by internal signals and labour-market data. We cover the data foundations, governance and operating model, and the integrations that keep compensation, talent and planning in sync. Expect a practical walkthrough of an MVP pattern, change control and versioning, and how to prioritise critical roles. You will leave able to refresh role profiles in weeks – not months – and link architecture decisions to mobility, workforce capacity, cost, and regulatory readiness.

This session will explore
  • What a dynamic, skills-based job architecture is – and where it differs from traditional job families and grades.
  • Data foundations: internal skills signals (profiles, projects, learning) and external labour-market data; mapping, inference and validation.
  • Operating model and governance: ownership, RACI, version control, approval workflow, and audit trail aligned to reward and legal.
  • Technology integration: connecting HRIS, compensation, talent marketplace and planning tools; APIs and evaluation loops to keep roles current.
  • Change and adoption: engaging HRBPs, Finance and Legal; communication patterns that help managers use refreshed roles.
  • Measuring impact: time-to-update, coverage of critical roles, mobility lift, planning cycle time, and pay-equity risk reduction.
Learning objectives
  • Define a minimal viable, skills-based job architecture and where to start (critical roles and risk hotspots).
  • Design a data pipeline that combines internal skills evidence with labour-market signals to refresh roles continuously.
  • Set up governance artefacts – RACI, change log, versioning and rollback – that satisfy Reward, Legal and Audit.
  • Integrate job architecture updates with compensation, talent and workforce planning so decisions stay in sync.
  • Build a simple benefits case that quantifies speed, cost, risk and mobility improvements Finance will recognise.
  • Avoid common pitfalls such as taxonomy sprawl, vendor lock-in and over-automation without stakeholder buy-in.

Elin Thomasian

Senior Vice President, Alliances & Strategy · TalentNeuron

Why this is on the agenda

Rapid work redesign, AI adoption and emerging pay-transparency requirements expose the limits of static job catalogues. Out-of-date roles slow planning, create pay risk, and block mobility. Finance and HR need faster, evidence-based updates that reflect market supply, internal skills and risk exposure. Dynamic job architecture enables control and speed to manage cost, capacity and fairness.